Thursday, March 17, 2016

SALT 1

After the Cuban missile crisis, many concerned Americans and soviets hoped for some de-escalation of the tense atmosphere. In fact, many historians nowadays would state that after such a heart stopping moment, those in control of the government and war machine would have opted for some amount of what we would come to call the detente.
However, it wasn’t until 1967 that Johnson called upon the Soviets to discuss some limitation to the arms being developed in both countries. Even then, this was only in response to the ABM system being built around Soviet Russia. The main point of the cold war, and the most assured way to keep both sides from detonating nuclear missiles on enemy soil was the concept of MAD, or mutual assured destruction. With the development of ABM’s, otherwise known as anti-ballistic missiles, there was a defensive system being set up around Russia. This would cause a kink in the idea of MAD, because if they had a defense system then America no longer had a way of retaliating against them in the event of nuclear war. Moreover, there was rumor of the Soviets building a missile with a range long enough to have first strike capabilities on the United States.

As such, the first strategic arms limitation talk, known as SALT 1 discusses the disassembly and limitation of the ABM’s set up around each country. While many might state that this is exactly the opposite of what the United States might want because we would not be able to have any reliable defensive structure around our nation, they would not fully understand the concept of MAD. If there was defense, then mutual destruction was no longer assured. The constant tension between the two countries and the fear was what kept each sure that the other would not detonate on enemy soil. As such, this talk, while not truly creating any lasting solution by any means, was able to continue on the relative safety of each country.

2 comments:

  1. Did you know that SALT I was the first time that the Soviet Union and the Americans agreed to limit the number of nuclear missiles each side could possess? Also, the two sides didn’t touch on the issue of MIRVs in SALT I and had to hold a SALT II where they decided to place limitations on MIRVS. Do you think it was possible to lessen the tensions between the two nations if MAD wasn’t the policy that dictated much of the cold war?

    Source:
    https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/salt

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not only did SALT I limit the number of ABM's, but also limited the number of ICBM's and submarine-launched missiles; however, this limitation was only to hold for 5 years. It was supposed to be renegotiated at SALT II, but the 2nd treaty was never ratified by the senate.

    source: http://www.britannica.com/event/Strategic-Arms-Limitation-Talks

    ReplyDelete